| Auximetric graph | Lm vs Linf graph | M vs Linf graph |
| Lm vs Linf graph | M vs K graph | |
| (loading of graphs may take 2-3 min.) | ||
| Main Ref. : | 1139 Data Ref. :796 | ||||||||||||
| Data Type : | |||||||||||||
| Sex : | unsexed | ||||||||||||
| L infinity (cm) : | 11.5 TL | 95% confidence limit: | |||||||||||
| K (1/y) : | 1.650 | n: | r2: | 95% confidence limit: | |||||||||
| to (y) : | 95% confidence limit: | ||||||||||||
| Winf. : | 15.00 g | other(see comments) b used :3.000 | Ø' : 2.34 | ||||||||||
| C : | |||||||||||||
| M (1/y) : | 2.450 M Ref. :796 M doubtful? | n: | r2: | 95% confidence limit: | |||||||||
| n.a. | |||||||||||||
| Lm (cm) : | 10.0 | 0.87 | Unsexed | Lm Ref. : 796 | |||||||||
| Locality : | Lake Suwa | ||||||||||||
| Country : | Japan | ||||||||||||
| Environment: | open waters | ||||||||||||
| Temp. : | 16.0 Temp. Ref. : 1139 | ||||||||||||
| Comment : | Winf from Ref. 1139. Lm too high (RF). M is a mean of values (1.1-3.8) from Sato (1950) and Shirashi (1957) cited in Ref. 796. Growth estimates outlier in auximetric graph? Yes. | ||||||||||||